AYU (An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda)

: 2012  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 365--367

Swarna Bhasma in cancer: A prospective clinical study

Soumen Das1, Mangal C Das2, Retina Paul3,  
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (SSKM Hospital), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Director, Department of Integrated Medicine, The Calcutta Gastroenterology Research Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Resident, Department of Microbiology, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Soumen Das
P-33, R.N. Tagore Road, Kolkata - 700077


Despite the advances in the treatment of cancer, mortality is still high. Complementary and alternative medicine is emerging as a potent modality in cancer treatment. «SQ»Swarna Bhasma«SQ» (SB), containing gold particles, is an ancient Indian medicine has shown its anticancer activity. This present study was conducted to detect the effect of SB on solid malignancies. A total of 43 patients were included in this study received SB for 1 year. Seventeen patients showed response. The response was best in rectal cancer group 70% (7/10). Nearly 41.02% patients survived for 1 year after treatment but after 5 years this came down to 15.38%.

How to cite this article:
Das S, Das MC, Paul R. Swarna Bhasma in cancer: A prospective clinical study.AYU 2012;33:365-367

How to cite this URL:
Das S, Das MC, Paul R. Swarna Bhasma in cancer: A prospective clinical study. AYU [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Feb 5 ];33:365-367
Available from: https://www.ayujournal.org/text.asp?2012/33/3/365/108823

Full Text


Incidence of cancer is ever increasing. [1] Despite modern diagnostic and treatment modalities (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) mortality and morbidity is still high. [1] Studies have demonstrated the anticancer activity of some complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) like 'Swarna Bhasma' (SB) (made of gold particles). [2] We conducted a prospective clinical trial on 43 patients with various solid malignancies (lung, liver, pancreas, gall bladder, and colon) with SB.

 Aims and Objectives

To assess the response of malignant tumors to SB.To identify the side effects of SB.

 Materials and Methods

Study area and duration

The study was conducted in the Calcutta Gastroenterology Research Centre (CGRI) situated in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The study started from January 2005 and completed in February 2010. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) and consent was taken from each patient in this regard.

Study design

The study was prospective, single arm, observational study.

Inclusion criteria

The patients of malignancy [confirmed by histo-pathological examination of per rectal biopsy, cyto-pathological exam of computed tomography (CT) guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)] involving lung, liver, pancreas, gall bladder, and rectum of both sexes were included. In all these patients palliative care was advised by treating oncologist.

Exclusion criteria

Operable tumorsPrior chemotherapy or radiotherapyPatients unwilling to have CAM.


SB powder (50 mg/kg/day) per-orally prescribed for 1 year or till disease progression or appearance of intolerable side effects.


Patients were followed up monthly for 1 year, then 6 monthly for 5 years. Response measured by (i) radiological tumor response (by CT scan or ultrasonography) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), (ii) survival, and (iii) side effects of SB.

According to RECIST criteria, response was divided into four groups:

Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or nontarget) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.)Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. [3]

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 11.0.1 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.


Out of 43 patients, 4 patients did not complete the treatment course. Thirty-nine patients received complete treatment and followed up for 5 years. Among them, 10 lung, 8 liver, 6 pancreas, 5 gall bladder, and 10 rectum cancer were present. Male: female ratio was 24:15. Mean age was 53 years. Carcinoma rectum patients were confirmed by colonoscopic or direct per-rectal biopsy, whereas others were confirmed by CT guided FNAC. Staging was done following American Joint Commitee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system 2002. Operable patients were excluded from the study. Out of 39 patients, 17 showed response (CR or PR). Response measured by radiological tumor size regression following RECIST criteria. [3] For lung, pancreatic, and gall bladder malignancy CT was used, whereas ultrasonography (per cuteneous and endoscopic) was used for liver and rectal cancers. The response was best in rectal cancer group 70% (7/10) was statistically significant. Nearly, 41.02% patients survived for 1 year after treatment but after 5 years this came down to 15.38% [Table 1]. No statistically significant preferential response based on gender was noted. Lung, gall bladder, and liver showed 40%, 40%, and 37.5% response, respectively [Figure 1]. Poor response was noted in pancreas group (16.66%). No significant side effect was noted during the course of treatment that led to discontinuation.{Figure 1}{Table 1}


Cancer treatment is an intensively researched area in the field of modern medicine. Despite this, outcome is not a gold standard. Need exists for an effective weapon. To fill this link CAM is an emerging as a potent modality. [3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] After review of published literature, it is evident that CAM is mostly used as palliative care. This study with SB is unique in its kind as it is being used as primary therapy.

SB ("Swarna " meaning gold, "Bhasma " meaning ash) is an ancient Indian Ayurvedic medicine used for rejuvenation and revitalization during old age. [3],[9],[10] Few recent laboratory studies established the pharmacological effects of gold nanoparticle (main ingredient of SB). Gold-silica nanoshell has been used in Nanoshell-Assisted Photo-Tthermal therapy (NAPT) to kill tumor cells by near Infra Red (IR) light. [4] It also showed analgesic property. [5] Gold-EGFR conjugates have been used to detect the cancer cells by exploiting the light scattering properties of gold nanoconjugates. [6] Its use in chronic lymphocytic leukemia showed good results. [7] In this study SB showed fare results in several solid tumors. But the sample size of this study is not adequate enough to have statistically significant results. Thus further randomized blinded studies with large sample size are to be contemplated to establish the effect of SB in malignancy.


Swarna Bhasma can be a potential drug for anticancer therapy. Randomized control trials with large sample size is required to establish this statement.


1Source: Available from: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media centre/iarcnews/2010/globocan2008.php last accessed on Feb 2012, 10.
2Hainfeld JF, Slatkin DN, Focella TM, Smilowitz HM. Gold nanoparticles: A new X-ray contrast agent. Br J Radiol 2006;79:248-53.
3Eisenhauera EA, Therasseb P, Bogaertsc J, Schwartzd LH, Sargente D, Fordf R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45: 228-47.
4Pitsillides CM, Joe EW, Wei X, Anderson RX, Lin CP. Selective cell targeting with lightabsorbing microparticles and nanoparticles. Biophys J 2003;84:4023-32.
5Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, Sershen SR, Rivera B, Price RE, et al. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13549-54.
6Bajaj S, Vohora SB. Analgesic activity of gold preparations used in Ayurveda and Unani-Tibb. Indian J Med Res 1998;108:104-11.
7El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA. Surface plasmon resonance scattering and absorption of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: Applications in oral cancer. Nano Lett 2005;5:829-4.
8Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, Kay N, Keating MJ, O'Brien S, et al. National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 1996;87:4990-7.
9Mohaptra S, Jha CB. Physicochemical characterization of Ayurvedic bhasma (Swarna makshika bhasma): An approach to standardization. Int J Ayurveda Res 2010;1:82-6.
10Paul W, Sharma CP. Blood compatibility studies of Swarna bhasma (gold bhasma), an Ayurvedic drug. Int J Ayurveda Res 2011;2:14-22.