|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 118-124
Researches on mercurial preparations: The prime requirement for their acceptance in medical world
Ex-Head, National Centre for Compositional Characterisation of Materials, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
|Date of Web Publication||3-Feb-2016|
Dr. J Arunachalam
302, Jyothi Pearl Apts, Srinivassa Nagar, Kapra, ECIL Post, Hyderabad - 500 062, Telangana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Ayurvedic and Siddha medicinal preparations containing mercury have been used over centuries in India. The recent WHO guidelines on the use of mercurials as well as actions by other international organizations into eliminating mercury in all forms have put the people practicing Rasa Shastra in a quandary. Active research in the mechanism of curative actions of mercurials is very much essential, to have widespread acceptance of the ancient practice. The toxicity of a substance depends on its bio-availability; the chemical form in which it is present and the biochemical reactions it participates. Mercury is usually administered as mercuric sulfide (Rasasindura or Linga Chendooram) which has a KSP value of 10–54. Despite this extreme insolubility, how mercury becomes bio-available under enzymatic conditions needs to be studied. Its bioaccumulation in critical organs and excretory pathways are to be ascertained. Research is also needed to establish whether Rasasindura or equivalent medicines induce the (excess) synthesis of sulfur containing biomolecules in human systems, which act as cell protectors against free radical-induced cell damage. The antioxidants themselves could be the curative agents; mercury being just a catalyst. It may also be possible that the exposure to mercury, even in very small amounts, could lead to the synthesis of specific metallothioneins in the human system, helping to detoxify the mercury exposure. The author is of the opinion that Ayurvedic practitioners/researchers should carry out long-term follow-up studies on human patients. The superiority of mercury based Ayurvedic preparations, as against modern allopathic medicines, in providing rapid and long lasting cure for specific diseases needs to document and published. In the absence of such supportive research literature, the use of mercury will become untenable, even for medicinal purposes.
Keywords: Kajjali, Makaradwaja, mercurial preparation, mercury, Parpati, Rasasindura
|How to cite this article:|
Arunachalam J. Researches on mercurial preparations: The prime requirement for their acceptance in medical world. AYU 2015;36:118-24
| Introduction|| |
Ayurvedic and Siddha medicinal preparations containing mercury have been prepared and used over centuries in India. Similar preparations exist in China and Japan too. The preparatory methods are based on various classical texts and administered to patients along with various adjuvants depending on the type of disease. The types of diseases treated with mercurials range from tuberculosis to diarrhea. The mercury-containing preparations are many: Ayurveda has Kajjali, Parpati, Rasasindura, and Makaradhwaja, (which are essentially a combination of mercury and sulfur) and some medicines like Garbhapala Rasa which have lower mercury contents. Similar mercury medicines like Linga Chendooram exist in Siddha traditions.
All forms of mercury (vapor, inorganic salts, and organic forms) are considered as toxic to human beings and in-depth reports exist detailing the deleterious effects of these various forms both in animal studies and in humans inadvertently exposed to mercury. The Minamata episode in Japan and the poisonous effects on children born to mothers who had consumed organic mercury contaminated wheat in Iraq are well documented and the recent outcry in the USA on the use of Thimerosal as a preservative of vaccines and the suspected link to autism in children, is the latest in the campaign against the use of mercury in any form and at any dose levels for medicinal purposes. The WHO mentions that exposure to mercury – even small amounts – may cause serious health problems, and is a threat to the development of the child in utero and early in life; mercury may have toxic effects on the nervous, digestive and immune systems, and on lungs, kidneys, skin, and eyes; and mercury is considered by WHO as one of the top 10 chemicals or groups of chemicals of major public health concern (WHO fact sheet No. 261, updated September 2013). Studies have indicated at least in animal experiments that mercury affects the nervous system and has been shown to accumulate in kidneys leading to atrophy and failure. The WHO/JECFA has set a limit of 4 µg/kg bw for inorganic mercury. This limit has been arrived at based on experiments using mercuric chloride (HgCl2), a soluble salt of mercury. The PTWI for methyl mercury it is 1.6 µg/kg bw. The literature is also replete with toxicity suffered by patients who have consumed Ayurvedic preparations containing heavy metals particularly, mercury and lead. It is to be noted; however, that majority of these cases are due to self-medication by the people and not under conditions of supervision under an Ayurvedic doctor.
It is in this background, the claim of Ayurvedic and Siddha practitioners on the safety of their preparations containing mercury under therapeutic doses is viewed with suspicion by modern medicine. However, many journal publications in recent times have appeared, based on animals (mice, rats, and dogs), reporting on the nontoxic effects of Ayurvedic and Siddha mercurial preparations and changes in biochemical parameters. These studies can help evolve therapeutic doses for humans.
| The Need for Complete Chemical and Physical Characterization of the Mercurials|| |
Much of the fear induced on the use of mercury is due to the inability of the most common analytical methods, which report on the total elemental concentration, (X-ray fluorescence, atomic absorption spectroscopy [AAS], inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy [ICP-AES]), and not on the exact chemical form in which mercury is present. The exact chemical form in which mercury is present has also to be analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), which provides the information on crystalline structure and X-Ray photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), which provides information on the oxidation state of the material, (especially where mercuric sulfide [HgS] is a major constituent) and infrared spectroscopy/fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the presence of organics. The presence of free mercury/free sulfur should also be ascertained in the preparations. Toxicity perception based total concentration levels can be misleading because the toxicity of a substance depends on its bio-availability; the chemical form in which it is present, the biochemical reactions it participates, and the dose combined with age and other medical conditions of the patient.
| Bio-Availability of Mercury|| |
The ancients brilliantly overcame the problem of mercury toxicity by severely reducing its bioavailability through the use of sulfur. They purified the raw mercury and sulfur through many steps using plants and salts and standardized the administered form of mercury as HgS, one of the least soluble substances. The KSP of HgS is 1 × 10–54. Thus, the quantum of mercury ions that would be available on the administration of mercury as sulfide can be much below the threshold of toxic limit (the use of arsenic, a toxic substance, again used as a highly insoluble sulfide, Rasamanikya, is illustrative of the concern of the ancient sages over the detoxification efforts needed, before declaring a substance as a medicine). However, HgS may be more soluble in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract due to the action of digestive enzymes, changing pH conditions and complexation with other biomolecules present in the food. This has to be determined upon by experimentation.
Experiments on the bio-availability of various forms of mercury indicated the following percentages of absorption: Cinnabar <0.2% in GI, mercury vapor 80% in lungs and <0.01% in GI, HgCl2 7–15% in GI and methyl mercury >95% in GI. The mercury thus adsorbed is found distributed to liver, kidney, and spleen while mercury vapor and methyl mercury result in accumulation in the brain. Autopsy studies on diseased humans in Greenland, exposed to mercury through food, have shown accumulation in kidney, spleen and liver, with kidney exhibiting highest accumulation. Neurotoxicity induced by cinnabar in guinea pigs has also been reported.
However, in the Indian context, all the animal studies have invariably reported that Rasasindura has not been found toxic under therapeutic doses; even though no analytical studies on the accumulation of mercury in different organs (in animal studies) have been published from major Indian institutions. Reviews on beneficial applications of Rasasindura, on human patients, as well as types of diseases it has been used have been published.
This dichotomous situation needs to be thoroughly examined to establish the safety associated with the Indian practices.
| Standardization of the Preparation and Composition|| |
Assay of purified mercury
Standard texts uniformly mention some 8 stages of purification or mercury. These steps are meant to remove natural impurities in mercury and make it “potent” but no high-quality assay on the purity (stoichiometrically) obtained after the 8 steps has been reported. Some authors surmise that while the inorganic metallic impurities are removed many organic entities get bound to the mercury up to even 4% by weight. There is also a mention that mercury purified by destructive distillation of Cinnabar after some specific treatment with plant juices can be used for medicinal preparations without the 8 steps. It is very essential to assay the purity of the mercury meant for medicinal preparation including the presences of other organics derived from treatment with plant extracts. Boiling point investigation and chromatographic techniques will help.
Purification steps have also been prescribed for sulfur which is more or less standard among all practitioners.
| Understanding the Process of Preparation of Kajjali|| |
Intimate mixing of purified mercury and sulfur to prepare the Kajjali seems to be the first step in the preparation of many mercury-based preparations, except for the use of mercurous chloride (Rasapushpa) and Hg2 Cl2 (Rasakarpura) in very small amounts in certain cases. The compound of mercury and sulfur is prepared in many ways, but one always finds the use of excess sulfur in the preparation of a form called Kajjali, more than required for the stoichiometric preparation of HgS (approximately sulfur at 1/6th of the weight of mercury). Classical texts have recommended the use of 1:1, 1:6 or even 1:16 of mercury and sulfur by weight. Why this emphasis on excess sulfur? The Kajjali itself is used as a simple medicine or forms the basis of preparations such as Parpati, Rasa Sindura, Makaradwaja (the most celebrated of all Ayurvedic medicines). Similar Siddha preparations are named as Linga Chendooram and Poorna Chandrodayam. Many recent reviews on the preparations and uses of these are found in literature.
In a study related immobilization and disposal of mercury, detailed observations on the process of mixing mercury and sulfur have been reported, using XRD and electron microscopy, as a function of grinding time. The grinding process slowly forms meta-cinnabar (black HgS) and up to 60 min of grinding, globules of mercury could be found to be present, using electron microscopy. After 90 min, free mercury could not be found but the most important observation is the formation of particles containing 2–15 weight% of mercuric oxide after 120 min of grinding. It is also found that the HgS particles are surrounded by sulfur particles. Aqueous extracts of this sample yielded <5 µg/L leachable mercury.
The study above used Hg: S in 1:1 weight proportion but in Ayurvedic literature one finds the mention of 1:6 and higher ratios of mercury and sulfur in the preparation of Kajjali. The idea could be to prevent oxidation as well as to make available more sulfur. Studies similar to the above should be done in so as to establish the desirable/optimum quantum of grinding and prevention of oxidation of the mercury due to over grinding under exposure to oxygen. It may possible to use mechanical grinders under an inert atmosphere.
| Mercury Speciation Studies in Body Fluids and Tissues|| |
The major species of mercury one usually encounters are the elemental (vapor), inorganic (Hg[I] and Hg[II]) and organic forms (methyl and ethyl mercury). Mercury vapor can be very easily determined by using cold vapor AAS (CVAAS) at nanogram levels and when combined with ICP-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), can be determined at parts per trillion levels. Inorganic mercury is reduced to elemental mercury and then determined using CVAAS or ICP-MS. Methods are available for the online separation of inorganic and organic (methyl) mercury and sequential determination of both in a single experimental step at parts per billion levels. All the methods have been standardized and are routine in many advanced analytical laboratories.
The uptake and distribution of mercury through the use of mercurial can be easily determined through the analysis of body whole blood and serum samples. The excretion can also be studied through the analysis of urine and fecal matter which can kind of give a mass balance of the dose administered and the mercury retained in the system. Such studies can go a long way in determining the variation in the biological sorption of mercury when administered as an insoluble sulfide (Rasasindura/Makaradwaja/Linga Chendooram) or as ionic salts (chlorides of mercury). The enhanced sensitivity of the modern analytical techniques enable the determination of mercury in biopsy samples of kidney, liver, etc., without having to sacrifice the animals in such experiments.
In humans, it is possible to analyze head hair before, during and after the stoppage of the mercury-based medicines, to follow-up qualitatively, the sorption and excretion of mercury.
| Analysis of Mercurials Prepared With Sulfur|| |
For over a decade, our laboratory, the National Centre for Compositional Characterisation of Materials, BARC, Hyderabad, has been involved in the development of a standardized analytical procedure for many mineral and metallic Ayurvedic medicines, as part of our association with CCRAS in this activity. Mercurials such as Rasasindura, Makaradwaja and Rasa Gandhi Mezhugu (a Siddha preparation) have been analyzed for the total content of mercury, sulfur and trace elements based on solution-based techniques such as ICP-AES and AAS. Scanning electron microscopy/EDAX has been used for rapid screening of the major element contents. XRD and XPS have been utilized to find out about the major crystalline phases and the oxidation states of the major elements, respectively. These standardization efforts have been shared with the concerned agencies. Rasasindura samples from many institutions were found to contain close to 81–83% of mercury and 14–16% of sulfur. The use of similar multi-technique approaches for the analytical characterization of Siddha medicines have been reported, which is very encouraging.
However, there exist in literature, compounds named as Rasasindoor with only 9% HgS and having a lot of organic matters still intact. How the organics could survive the extremely high temperatures used in the synthesis is a mystery! A study has reported that Siddha Makradwaja has only mercury and sulfur but does not contain even traces of any other element. However, Makaradwaja samples received from Gujarat Ayurved University, analyzed in our lab, have been found to contain gold at 20–270 ppm [Table 1]. It has been explained that the variation of gold content depends on the type of gold used  or the extent sulfur used. Some preparations even report Poorna Chandrodayam (a preparation similar to that of Makaradwaja) having close to 9% gold!
It is essential standard methods for preparations and standard nomenclatures should be arrived at, well documented and be adopted in pharmaceutical literature, for specific medicines, pertaining to the discipline.
| Analysis of Free Mercury and Sulfur in the Medicines|| |
It has been our observation, in the analysis of Rasasindura and Makaradhwaja, that the contents of the major constituents do not add up to 100%. The qualitative analysis did not identify any extra constituents. This leads to the suspicion that there could be free sulfur embedded onto the matrix of the HgS. In a study mentioned earlier, based on EDAX it is found that the Linga Chendooram sample could have up to 5.8% excess sulfur than calculated for the total mercury being in HgS form. Methods exist to analyze free sulfur  which, when used will help investigate the thoroughly the Kupipakwa procedure, used by many for HgS based preparations. Free sulfur, if found, can help explain the nontoxic nature of the mercurial as prepared and used by Indian practitioners, as can be surmised in the subsequent sections of this paper.
| Further Research Studies Needed to Make Mercurials Acceptable on Par With Modern Medicines|| |
The following suggestions are put forward for the consideration of people working in biochemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacovigilance.
The curative action of mercurials will have to be explained on molecular action basis. Certain actions like anti-bacterial activities are explained based on cell wall damage or suppression of antioxidant activity when soluble mercurials are used. However, when nominally insoluble sulfide is used, it is very essential to quantify the dissolution and bioavailability in the GI track in human studies. That orally administered Rasasindura or Makaradhwaja is therapeutically active indicates that mercury is absorbed in the GI tract and reaches the target organ/tissue. The mechanism of such transfer needs to be understood first.
| The Role of Adjuvant (Anupana)|| |
Each mercurial preparation is administered along with a specific adjuvant, depending upon the disease. Current knowledge enables us to understand that many of these adjuvants, themselves have many anti-oxidant molecular entities. Why the ancients chose a specific Anupana needs to be researched and explained, in medical parlance.
| Role of Metallothioneins in Reducing/eliminating Mercury Toxicity|| |
Metallothioneins are small molecular weight peptides containing close to 20 and above cysteine amino acid units and are considered to play a central role in the physiology of detoxification of heavy metals. The SH group very strongly complexes mercury. Heavy metals induce the synthesis of phytochelatines (cysteine containing peptides) in plants; similarly it may be possible that the exposure to mercury, even in very small amounts, could lead to the synthesis of specific metallothioneins in the human system, helping to detoxify the mercury exposure. Metallothionein has been shown to be responsible for binding most of the mercury in rat kidney when HgCl2 was administered. Further research in the mechanism of mercury detoxification through metallothioneins is very much essential.
| Whether Antioxidant Synthesis Is Induced by Consuming Mercurials|| |
As mentioned earlier, some mercurials like Kajjali have excess sulfur, and even Linga Chendooram is reported to contain free sulfur, perhaps trapped in the crystal lattice of HgS. It is well known that sulfur is a very important nutrient and many biomolecules such as methionine, cysteine, cystin, taurine, and antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione (GSH) and many more, contain sulfur., Thus, research is needed to establish whether Rasasindura or equivalent medicines induce the (excess) synthesis of these sulfur-containing biomolecules in human systems. Antioxidants are the cell protectors against free radical-induced cell damage and it is quite possible that the rejuvenating effects and the reversal of aging effects, alluded to Makaradhwaja could be due to sulfur consumed along with. Detailed biochemical analyses will be the key to answer these questions. The antioxidants themselves could be the curative agents while mercury could serve as a transient catalyst. Enhanced production of GSH production in the kidney due to HgCl2 orally given than when HgS (mercuric salts of very different solubility) was administered, has been observed.
| A Brief Summary of Works Carried Out at National Centre for Compositional Characterisation of Materials, Hyderabad|| |
- Toxicity of Rasasindura (HgS) and Rasamanikya (arsenic trisulfide) were evaluated through standard bacterial study procedures. While Rasasindura was found not to show any bactericidal effects, inorganic mercury (Hg 2+) species exhibited high toxicity. At 5 ppm of Hg +2 completely inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas aurgenosa and yeast and at 1 ppm, a twofold and 4 fold decrease in the viability of P. aurgenosa and yeast respectively, have been observed. Rasamanikya did not show any toxicity at 10 and 20 µg but showed slight toxicity at 30–50 µg levels, but much lower than the toxicity exhibited by gentamycin (5 µg) [Table 2]
- A study in our laboratory on the anti-oxidant status of mice fed with Rasamanikya has shown that the superoxide dismutase, GSH, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels had shown an increase in the liver and showed a significant decrease in liver TBARS thus ensuring cell protection. In the case of the kidney, the GPx levels were much reduced at the double dose level as well as elevation in the kidney TBARS levels indicated that at double dose levels the kidneys could be impaired. Such assessments are planned for Rasasindura, but other research groups have reported on its nontoxic nature based on biochemical parameters and histopathology observations [Figure 1].
|Table 2: Toxicity studies on three bacterial species w.r.t. Rasamanikya (As2S3)|
Click here to view
|Figure 1: Effect of Rasamanikya on antioxidant status of mice: An in vivo study|
Click here to view
These preliminary studies clearly indicate that the synthesis of antioxidant molecules to get triggered on the exposure to toxic elements but the response in liver and kidney are different. Much more detailed studies are the need of the day.
| Conclusions|| |
Controlled experimentation with complete records as well as follow-up of patients over a long period is essential when mercurials have been used to treat specific diseases. The use of modern analytical techniques is a must to characterize the drug, its interaction with specific body tissues/organs and to provide a molecular basis for the curative aspects. In the task of bringing into the mainstream, the unutilized potential of the ancient science of healing, a close interaction of practitioners of traditional Indian Systems of Medicine (ISM) and Allopathy and involvement of national institutions is a must. Regional institutions with a suite of sophisticated analytical instruments catering to the needs of ISM would go a long way in supporting generating validated data.
The author is of the opinion that Ayurvedic practitioners/researchers should carry out long-term follow-up studies on human patients, and publish them in standard medical literature, rather than in in-house or obscure journals. Therapeutic efficiencies of mercury based preparations and modern Allopathic medicines in providing rapid and long lasting cure for specific diseases need to be compared, documented and published.
The author wishes to thank Dr. Aruna Jyothi Kora and Ms. Lori Rastogi, (NCCCCM, Hyderabad) who have shared their works on biochemical studies, which are briefly described in this article.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Saper RB, Kales SN, Paquin J, Burns MJ, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, et al.
Heavy metal content of Ayurvedic herbal medicine products. JAMA 2004;292:2868-73.
Liu J, Shi JZ, Yu LM, Goyer RA, Waalkes MP. Mercury in traditional medicines: Is cinnabar toxicologically similar to common mercurials? Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2008;233:810-7.
Johansen P, Mulvad G, Pedersen HS, Hansen JC, Riget F. Human accumulation of mercury in Greenland. Sci Total Environ 2007;377:173-8.
Chuu JJ, Young YH, Liu SH, Lin-Shiau SY. Neurotoxicity of mercury sulfide in the vestibular ocular reflex system of Guinea pigs. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2001;364:249-58.
Kanojia A, Sharma A, Urimindi V, Gotecha VK. Toxicological evaluation of Rasa-Sindoor in albino rats. Int Ayurvedic Med J 2013;1:1-6.
Patgiri BJ, Gokarn RA. Research works done on Rasasindura
(sublimated mercurial preparation) – A review. Ayurpharm Int J Ayurveda Allied Sci 2014;3:41-7.
Gokarn RA, Patgiri BJ, Galib R, Prajapati PK. Review on Rasasindura
– A mercurial preparation of Indian system of medicine. Int J Pharm Biol Arch 2012;3:1360-7.
Dole V, Pranjape P. A Text Book of Rasashastra. New Delhi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan; 2004.
Lopez FA, Alguacil FJ, Roman CP, Tayabi H, Lopez DA. Disposal of Elemental Mercury via Sulphur Reaction by Milling, 1st
International Conference on “Hazardous Waste Management”. 1-3 October, Chania, Crete, Greece; 2008.
Karunasagar D, Arunachalam J, Gangadharan S. Development of a “collect and punch” CV-ICPMS method for the direct determination of mercury at nanogram per litre levels. J Anal At Spectrom 1998;13:679-82.
Krishna MVB, Ranjit M, Karunasagar D, Arunachalam J. A rapid ultrasound-assisted thiourea extraction method for the determination of inorganic and methyl mercury in biological and environmental samples by CVAAS. Talanta 2005;67:70-80.
Sudha A, Murthy VS, Chandra TS. Standardization of metal based herbal medicines. Am J Infect Dis 2009;5:193-9.
Singh SK, Chaudhary A, Rai DK, Rai SB. Preparation and characterization of a mercury based Indian traditional drug – Ras Sindoor. Indian J Tradit Knowl 2009;8:346-51.
Kumar A, Nair AGC, Reddy AV, Garg AN. Bhasmas: Unique Ayurvedic metallic-herbal preparations, chemical characterization. Biol Trace Elem Res 2006;109:231-54.
Khedekar S, Patgiri BJ, Ravishankar B, Prajapati PK. Standard manufacturing process of Makaradhwaja prepared by Swarna Patra – Varkha and Bhasma. Ayu 2011;32:109-15.
Dhundi SN, Patgiri B, Prajapati PK, Shukla VJ, Ravishankar B. Pharmaceutical study of Triguna and Shadguna Balijarita Makaradhwaja. Ayu 2012;33:412-7.
Austin A. Chemcial characterization of a gold and mercury based Siddha sasthric preparation – Poorna chandrodayam. Am J Drug Discov Dev 2012;2:110-23.
Dash K, Thangavel S, Krishnamurthy NV, Rao SV, Karunasagar D, Arunachalam J. Ultrasound-assisted analyte extraction for the determination of sulfate and elemental sulfur in zinc sulfide by different liquid chromatography techniques. Analyst 2005;130:498-501.
Sato M, Kondoh M. Recent studies on metallothionein: Protection against toxicity of heavy metals and oxygen free radicals. Tohoku J Exp Med 2002;196:9-22.
Wisniewska JM, Trojanowska B, Piotrowski J, Jakubowski M. Binding of mercury in the rat kidney by metallothionein. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1970;16:754-63.
Atmaca G. Antioxidant effects of sulfur-containing amino acids. Yonsei Med J 2004;45:776-88.
Parcell S. Sulfur in human nutrition and applications in medicine. Altern Med Rev 2002;7:22-44.
Sin YM, Teh WF, Wong MK. Absorption of mercuric chloride and mercuric sulphide and their possible effects on tissue glutathione in mice. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1989;42:307-14.
[Table 1], [Table 2]