Login   |  Users Online: 297 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
   Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 238-242

Clinical effect of Virechana and Shamana Chikitsa in Tamaka Shwasa (Bronchial Asthma)


1 Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Kaya Chikitsa, Institute for Post Graduate Teaching and Research in Ayurveda, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India
2 Head and Reader, Department of Kaya Chikitsa, Institute for Post Graduate Ayurveda Education and Research at Shyama Das Vaidya Shastrapith Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Kuntal A Ghosh
Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Kaya Chikitsa, I.P.G.T. & R.A., Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar - 361008, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-8520.105244

Rights and Permissions

To evaluate comparative efficacy of Samshodhana and Samshamana Chikitsa, the current study is planned in 24 patients of Tamaka Shwasa. Thirteen patients (Group A) were treated with Samshodhana, particularly with Virechana Karma. The patients of this group received Abhyantara Snehana with Tila Taila followed by Bahya Snehana with Tila Taila and Saindhava Lavana. After observations of proper signs of Snehana; Virechana Karma was performed with Aragvadha Phala Majja. Samsarjana Krama was followed for five days. Subsequently all the patients were given the trial drug (powder of Badara). The patients of group B, were treated only with the powder of dried ripe fruits of Badara. In both groups, the dose of Badara powder was 5 g, twice a day, with luke warm water, for a period of 60 days. In group A, maximum number of patients (61.45 %) showed good response, while in group B, 45.45 % patients showed good response. No side effects were observed during the clinical trial. Based on the observations, it was concluded that, group A is more effective than group B.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2571    
    Printed63    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded449    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal