Login   |  Users Online: 297 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
   Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 188-193

A Clinical evaluation of Haridra Khanda & Pippalyadi Taila Nasya on Pratishyaya (Allergic Rhinitis)


1 Lecturer in Shalakya Tantra, Sheth J.P. Govt. Ayurveda College, Bhavnagar, India
2 Reader in Shalakya Tantra, I.P.G.T. & R.A., Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, India
3 M.S. (E.N.T.) MB, DLO, Jamnagar, India
4 Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Shalakya Tantra, I.P.G.T. & R.A., Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, India

Correspondence Address:
Chhaya Bhakti
Lecturer in Shalakya Tantra, Sheth J.P. Govt. Ayurveda College, Bhavnagar
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common and most prevalent ailment, familiar to all with an equal distribution more or less through out the world, rather without any exception to the developed and under developed countries. Bronchial asthma is the main complication of allergic rhinitis because patients of nasal allergy have four times more risk of developing bronchial asthma. In modern medical system a wide range of antibiotics and decongestants is available, but these drugs give only symptomatic relief. So it is need of hour to develop a treatment protocol, which helps the patients to overcome this pathetic condition hence this problem was selected for the study taking all these points into consideration. In this present study Pippalyadi taila for Nasya therapy and Haridra khanda as oral drug was selected. Total 32 patients were registered and randomly divided into two groups. In group A Haridra khanda and in group B Pippalyadi taila Nasya along with Haridra khanda were given for 2 months. The effect of therapy in both groups was assessed by a specially prepared proforma. In both the groups an apparent difference in all the signs and symptoms was observed. In oral group and combined group maximum number of patients i.e., 45.45% and 53.33% respectively showed marked improvement.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2176    
    Printed43    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded349    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal